{"id":4392,"date":"2015-09-24T14:50:20","date_gmt":"2015-09-24T18:50:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/?p=4392"},"modified":"2016-01-25T10:49:31","modified_gmt":"2016-01-25T15:49:31","slug":"report-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/report-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion\/","title":{"rendered":"Report of UofL Board of Trustee Committee on Governance Released Amidst Confusion."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In <a href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/board-of-trustees-to-address-accountability-of-university-of-louisville\/\" target=\"_blank\">December 2014<\/a>, \u00a0with a background of increasing concerns expressed publicly\u00a0by several University of Louisville Trustees that they were not given the information needed, nor the opportunity to discuss issues central to the Board\u2019s legislatively mandated oversight responsibilities, \u00a0a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/board-agenda-item.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">draft proposal<\/a> was put before the full Board by several of the newly appointed Trustees to reevaluate the how the Board was performing its obligations. The proposal had the following overall goals:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Ensure that the board is acting under current national best governance practices in exercising its powers under KRS 164.830.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Demonstrate a deep commitment to improving the academic experience and outcome for our students.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Foster greater openness, dialogue, discussion, education and accountability with the board to allow us to better assist in exercising our duties.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The remainder of the two-page document offered concerns and suggestions to be considered.\u00a0 These seemed pretty reasonable to me.\u00a0 Indeed, one could reasonably ask why such issues should have to be raised in the first place!\u00a0 Nonetheless, this modest proposal was immediately attacked by old-guard members of the Board who seem to act\u00a0as President Ramsey\u2019s \u201cbest-friends-forever\u201d rather than as trustees with a fiduciary responsibility to the University of Louisville and its public. The questioners were in my opinion essentially told they were insufficiently informed, and had no business meddling with the operations of the University.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p><b>New committee appointed.<\/b><br \/>\nAt the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/uofl-board-of-trustees-addresses-governance-and-approves-new-faculty-practice-plan\/\" target=\"_blank\">February 2015 meeting<\/a> when the document was brought before the whole board, and with little or no discussion, Chairman Robert Hughes announced that he would appoint an Ad Hoc Committee on Governance.\u00a0 I later expressed a concern that while seeming to address the concerns of both trustees and the public, that the move could just as easily be seen as a way to brush those concerns under the rug.\u00a0 In my opinion that is exactly what has happened.\u00a0 In fact, the two principle authors of the \u201cDraft Request\u201d also perceived the maneuver in that way and wrote to Chairman Hughes <a href=\"http:\/\/insiderlouisville.com\/metro\/education-community\/rift-emerges-u-l-trustees-re-examine-role\/\" target=\"_blank\">expressing their surprise and disappointment <\/a>with the handpicked committee and believed the initiative was \u201cmisleading to the public and UofL constituencies.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><b>Things got hot.<\/b><br \/>\nIn May, following incremental revelations about the authorization and true amount of President James Ramsey\u2019s compensation, there was a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/presidential-outburst-at-uofl-board-meeting\/\" target=\"_blank\">testy Board meeting<\/a> in which President Ramsey lashed out at critics for not trusting him, including by implication trustees who were unfairly being labeled as dissidents.\u00a0 \u201cWhy can\u2019t we just get along\u201d pleaded a long-time Ramsey supporter. Chairman Hughes and others brushed-off the concerns of the new Trustees by asserting that it was not the place of Board members to meddle in University Operations.\u00a0 [If not them, who?] \u00a0Since then,\u00a0outward acrimony has settled down.\u00a0 Surely the Board recognized that some semblance of coherent and cooperative activity was essential to support the reputation of the institution.\u00a0 Indeed, on the eve of the scheduled presentation of the Committee&#8217;s report, I had a premonition that \u00a0the <em>status quo<\/em>\u00a0would be preserved\u00a0when President Ramsey confidently informed the Faculty Senate that the Trustees would come together tomorrow and \u201csing Kumbaya.\u201d\u00a0 He was right.<\/p>\n<p><b>Trust me!<\/b><br \/>\nI and many others had been waiting for the fruit of the Ad Hoc Committee&#8217;s work.\u00a0 Earlier this month it fell from the tree, or rather splatted on the ground.\u00a0 At the end of a long afternoon, an agenda item referring to the report of the committee was called.\u00a0 Longstanding Trustee Bob Benson, a strong supporter of President Ramsey, offered a motion to accept the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee on Governance.\u00a0 Much to the surprise of most in the room, the report itself had not been shared even with all the Board members! \u00a0In my view, this omission is proof-positive that a complaint of insufficient information being provided to the Board is embarrassingly justified! \u00a0Furthermore, it appears to me that the motion-to-accept referred to\u00a0documents\u00a0not in the final report itself, such as the new Conflict of Interest Statements! \u00a0Was this language misleading or simply bad?\u00a0 Please read the relevant documents themselves\u2013 they are not long. Here is the initial <a href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/board-agenda-item.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Draft Proposal<\/a> from 2014, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/trustees-letter-hughes-mar-2015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Trustees Letter<\/a> to Chairman Hughes, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/motion-accept-adhoc-9-3-15.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Motion to Accept<\/a> the (undisclosed) recommendation of the committee, and the actual final <a href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/final-rpt-adhoc9-3-15.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Governance<\/a> provided to me by the University.<\/p>\n<p><b>Postponed<\/b>.<br \/>\nWhen the absurdity of asking the Board to vote on the recommendations of an unseen document became apparent, the motion was withdrawn and the matter postponed without further discussion to a future meeting.\u00a0 I predict that we of the public will not hear another word of public discussion.\u00a0 When I was a member of a UofL affiliated Board, we met in below-quorum sessions so that we would not have to comply with open meeting laws where a final vote on an issue\u00a0would be taken.\u00a0 I hope that is no longer a practice of the University\u2019s Boards, but given that I rarely hear meaningful discussion of matters at Board meetings, I am forced to wonder if the most important deliberations are being conducted elsewhere and out of\u00a0the public eye.<\/p>\n<p><b>Comments on the report.<\/b><br \/>\nOn the face of it, the 3-page final report will be a disappointment for those with hopes for a more engaged board. The Board will be given a new statement of roles and responsibilities but who will prepare that statement is not mentioned.\u00a0 Much credence is given to the concept of formalizing a mentorship program whereby longer-standing Board members will \u201cmentor\u201d [read perhaps \u201csupervise\u201d] new ones.\u00a0 One recommendation establishes a \u201cpeer-review\u201d evaluation of individual trustees.\u00a0 Such group-think can place \u201cquestioning\u201d or \u201cconcerned\u201d trustees under pressure to conform\u2013 to sing Kumbaya continuously.\u00a0 Two pragmatic and commendable recommendations include a robust Conflict of Interest procedure (no more Trustees doing business with the University (they have and do), and a proposal to allow the student, staff, and faculty representatives on the Board have the full voting rights currently shared by the fifteen \u201cat large\u201d trustees and the two Alumni Club representatives (Go Cards!)<\/p>\n<p><b>More a welcome than an orientation.<\/b><br \/>\nMuch credence is awarded to the \u201dOrientation Program\u201d offered\u00a0to all new trustees.\u00a0 I must say, having just sat through that session myself with three new trustees earlier this month, I found it to be superficial and that it addressed virtually none\u00a0of the issues on the table.\u00a0 In fact, anyone who reads the newspaper would have learned little that was new. Trustees who needed such a basic introduction probably should not be serving as trustees in the first place.\u00a0 The orientation is mostly just another opportunity for the Administration to spread its gospel.<\/p>\n<p><b>Non-profit status in jeopardy?<\/b><br \/>\nInterestingly, the report contains a paragraph emphasizing the necessity of external review when determining the compensation of the President.\u00a0 It is being <a href=\"http:\/\/insiderlouisville.com\/metro\/education-community\/president-ramseys-large-compensation-u-l-foundation-run-afoul-irs-rules-nonprofits\/\" target=\"_blank\">reported elsewhere<\/a> that such a\u00a0required step appears not to have been documented in determining the salary of President Ramsey and other high ranking executives which would be a\u00a0violation of federal non-profit tax law. The possibility that the President and involved individual Board members may be personally liable for fines and claw-back of money may be an additional incentive to sing around the campfire.\u00a0 The claim that the University and Foundation may have violated their non-profit status appears plausible\u00a0and should not\u00a0be dismissed out of hand.\u00a0 Hopefully the Kentucky State Auditor\u2019s office can help lay this matter to rest for us all. To me the fact that the claim has legs is yet another piece of evidence that earlier Boards have not been doing their job and that a demand to reconsider and adjust University governance is absolutely necessary.<\/p>\n<p><b>Pay to Play?<\/b><br \/>\nIn contrast to their junior status in operational matters, the Board is encouraged to help raise money for the University through <em>\u201cpersonal philanthropic support!<\/em>\u00a0 Surely the ability to donate money for the university must not be used as criteria for appointment or in \u201cpeer evaluation.\u201d I have discussed the flawed process of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/nomination-and-board-appointment-process-at-uofl-is-broken\/\" target=\"_blank\">Board nomination and appointment<\/a> elsewhere.<\/p>\n<p><b>More subjugation of Board to President.<br \/>\n<\/b>The Board is expected to uphold the following statement of fiduciary principles: \u00a0<em>\u201cThe legal expectations of the duties of care, loyalty, and obedience are the essentials of board responsibility.\u201c<\/em>\u00a0 Why is obedience a required factor for a Board member?\u00a0 Obedience to who? Who gives the orders?<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><em>\u201cThe Board must place a high degree of trust in the President.\u201d\u00a0<\/em> Trust is necessary, but the other side of that coin is that trust must be earned.\u00a0 Blind trust is the antithesis of fiduciary responsibility.<\/li>\n<li><em>A specific trait for a board chair is \u201ca sense of partnership with the chief executive.\u201d<\/em><\/li>\n<li>The report notes that <em>\u201cBoards that meet almost monthly may be overdoing their oversight responsibility and ultimately diminishing their effectiveness.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0 In other words, \u201cstep away from the table and let us management do our thing.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>What will happen?<\/b><br \/>\nOne paragraph more than others gives me pause to believe that nothing is going to change from the inside. The Trustees are told<em> \u201cnot to focus on day-to-day management and operations\u201d<\/em> and to trust the President and his minions.\u00a0 Yet it has been a series of well documented failures and scandals stemming from breakdown of day-to-day management and operations that has badly compromised the integrity of the University in the eyes of the public.\u00a0 Of course our Board is responsible, just as the Board at Penn State had ultimate responsibility for the grotesque failures there.\u00a0 Of course<em> \u201cIt is imperative our board works with the president in ways that respect and support his leadership and advance the mission of the institution,\u201d<\/em> and that <em>\u201cThe board needs to form a robust partnership and an effective working relationship between the board and the president.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0 However, that does not mean that the Board must kowtow or swear obedience to an overlord. As one Trustee put it, <em>\u201cSometimes loyalty means asking questions.\u201d<\/em> I agree.\u00a0 The process at UofL seems designed to suppress questions and stigmatize the questioner.<\/p>\n<p>The report uses much noble-sounding language that is hard to disagree with. It gives at least lip service to higher education\u2019s most basic tenants of <em>\u201cinstitutional autonomy and independence, the protection of academic freedom, and service to a public purpose.\u201d\u00a0<\/em> However, given the background against which this document was prepared, the report in my opinion takes away trustee responsibility in favor of senior administrative autonomy. \u00a0[I wince as\u00a0I recall how much autonomy, independence, and freedom was so willingly given up by UofL administration in its\u00a0recent partnership with KentuckyOne Health\/CHI.] \u00a0I do not see this report as a win for trustees demanding more transparency, accountability, and openness for both the Board and the public.\u00a0 What do you think?\u00a0 The fact that an attempt was made to approve it before its circulation or any general discussion is very troubling. It is hard for me to believe\u00a0that this was simply an\u00a0oversight. \u00a0 I predict that at next month\u2019s series of Board meetings that we will hear very little more.\u00a0 The battle over accountability may have been\u00a0lost even as it was first enjoined.<\/p>\n<p>Peter Hasselbacher, MD<br \/>\nPresident, KHPI<br \/>\nEmeritus Professor, UofL<br \/>\nSept 24, 2015<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-sharing-enabled\"><div class=\"robots-nocontent sd-block sd-social sd-social-icon-text sd-sharing\"><h3 class=\"sd-title\">Share this:<\/h3><div class=\"sd-content\"><ul><li><a href=\"#\" class=\"sharing-anchor sd-button share-more\"><span>Share<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-end\"><\/li><\/ul><div class=\"sharing-hidden\"><div class=\"inner\" style=\"display: none;\"><ul><li class=\"share-facebook\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-facebook-4392\" class=\"share-facebook sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/report-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion\/?share=facebook\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on Facebook\" ><span>Facebook<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-linkedin\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-linkedin-4392\" class=\"share-linkedin sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/report-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion\/?share=linkedin\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on LinkedIn\" ><span>LinkedIn<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-end\"><\/li><li class=\"share-twitter\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-twitter-4392\" class=\"share-twitter sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/report-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion\/?share=twitter\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on Twitter\" ><span>Twitter<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-email\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"\" class=\"share-email sd-button share-icon\" href=\"mailto:?subject=%5BShared%20Post%5D%20Report%20of%20UofL%20Board%20of%20Trustee%20Committee%20on%20Governance%20Released%20Amidst%20Confusion.&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.khpi.org%2Fblog%2Freport-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion%2F&share=email\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to email a link to a friend\" data-email-share-error-title=\"Do you have email set up?\" data-email-share-error-text=\"If you&#039;re having problems sharing via email, you might not have email set up for your browser. You may need to create a new email yourself.\" data-email-share-nonce=\"77ea9a0f0e\" data-email-share-track-url=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/report-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion\/?share=email\"><span>Email<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-end\"><\/li><li class=\"share-end\"><\/li><\/ul><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In December 2014, \u00a0with a background of increasing concerns expressed publicly\u00a0by several University of Louisville Trustees that they were not given the information needed, nor the opportunity to discuss issues central to the Board\u2019s legislatively mandated oversight responsibilities, \u00a0a draft proposal was put before the full Board by several of the newly appointed Trustees to &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/report-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Report of UofL Board of Trustee Committee on Governance Released Amidst Confusion.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-sharing-enabled\"><div class=\"robots-nocontent sd-block sd-social sd-social-icon-text sd-sharing\"><h3 class=\"sd-title\">Share this:<\/h3><div class=\"sd-content\"><ul><li><a href=\"#\" class=\"sharing-anchor sd-button share-more\"><span>Share<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-end\"><\/li><\/ul><div class=\"sharing-hidden\"><div class=\"inner\" style=\"display: none;\"><ul><li class=\"share-facebook\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-facebook-4392\" class=\"share-facebook sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/report-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion\/?share=facebook\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on Facebook\" ><span>Facebook<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-linkedin\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-linkedin-4392\" class=\"share-linkedin sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/report-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion\/?share=linkedin\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on LinkedIn\" ><span>LinkedIn<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-end\"><\/li><li class=\"share-twitter\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-twitter-4392\" class=\"share-twitter sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/report-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion\/?share=twitter\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on Twitter\" ><span>Twitter<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-email\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"\" class=\"share-email sd-button share-icon\" href=\"mailto:?subject=%5BShared%20Post%5D%20Report%20of%20UofL%20Board%20of%20Trustee%20Committee%20on%20Governance%20Released%20Amidst%20Confusion.&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.khpi.org%2Fblog%2Freport-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion%2F&share=email\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to email a link to a friend\" data-email-share-error-title=\"Do you have email set up?\" data-email-share-error-text=\"If you&#039;re having problems sharing via email, you might not have email set up for your browser. You may need to create a new email yourself.\" data-email-share-nonce=\"77ea9a0f0e\" data-email-share-track-url=\"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/report-of-uofl-board-of-trustee-committee-on-governance-released-amidst-confusion\/?share=email\"><span>Email<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-end\"><\/li><li class=\"share-end\"><\/li><\/ul><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5mRQe-18Q","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4392"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4392"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4392\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4653,"href":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4392\/revisions\/4653"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4392"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4392"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4392"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}