{"id":7375,"date":"2022-10-04T14:46:34","date_gmt":"2022-10-04T18:46:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/?p=7375"},"modified":"2022-10-04T16:29:03","modified_gmt":"2022-10-04T20:29:03","slug":"marked-improvement-in-kentuckys-covid-epidemic-or-plateau-how-to-judge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.khpi.org\/blog\/marked-improvement-in-kentuckys-covid-epidemic-or-plateau-how-to-judge\/","title":{"rendered":"Marked Improvement In Kentucky’s Covid Epidemic \u2013 Or Plateau? How To Judge?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

“There’s something happening here.
What it is ain’t exactly clear.”<\/p>Buffalo Springfield<\/cite><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

On its face, yesterday’s Covid-19 update from the Kentucky Department of Public Health reported a continued dramatic decrease last week in the number of new cases, test positivity ratio, overall incidence rate, and the number of counties “in-the-red” with respect to new cases per 100K population.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 Number of New Cases in previous week: 3,979. (Average per day= 568)
\u2022 New Cases in individuals 18 years old or younger in prev. week: 2,168.
\u2022 Overall (KY) Average Daily Incidence rate: 11.9 cases per 100K population.
\u2022 Test Positivity Rate (as calculated): 7.7% of selected PCR tests.
\u2022 Number (Red) Counties with Incidence Rates greater than 25 per 100K= 5.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Big-league drops in selected new cases.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a>
Incidence Rate tracks (necessarily) the number of cases chosen to report.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a>
Test Positivity also derived from case identification.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a>
Red counties have incidence rates greater than 25 per 100K Population. (Still have to count cases accurately.)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

But…<\/strong>
On the other hand, there is ample evidence that the actual number of new weekly cases is vastly underreported. Furthermore, there are anomalies in the data that should raise concerns about the accuracy and timeliness of our data collection and reporting systems and therefore the degree of any putative decline in Kentucky’s epidemic activity. Reliable case counts are essential as the CDC prepares its Community Level Maps. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example:
The actual number of new cases<\/strong> added to Kentucky\u2019s running total of cases total is 8,975\u2013 little different than the total increments of the past 4 weeks and much higher than last April\/May. Looking at it another way, this week’s “uncounted cases” of 4,996 is the highest is has been since the state switched over to a weekly reporting schedule last March. Surely this considerable delay in reporting compromises the basis of policy changes of the past month that led to the dropping broadly of non-medicinal public health measures. Since the calculation of disease incidence rates relies on the accuracy of new case counts, I doubt that only 5 counties are in the red!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
“New Cases” plus catch-up reporting of cases. Decline or plateau?<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a>
Cases added to aggregate total of cases but not reported as “new.”<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Test Positivity Rates:<\/strong>
The percent of “new cases” identified by reported PCR viral RNA testing jumped up to 72% from the low 50s of the previous 2 weeks. I am unaware of any systematic or structural changes last week that would alter this ratio so greatly. Additionally, the total number of PCR tests reported from which the positivity rate is calculated dropped to its lowest level since March. That there has been a major perturbation in our testing and reporting structure is evident in the percent of new cases in individuals. Last week the percent of new cases in school-age individuals rocketed up to 54%\u2013 the highest by far since the beginning of Kentucky\u2019s Covid-19 epidemic when that number remained below 30%. With apologies to Buffalo Springfield, “There’s something happening here. What it is ain’t exactly clear.”<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Percent of reported New Cases accounted for by the positive PCR tests among those used to calculate Test Positivity Ratios.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a>
Percent of reported New Cases in people aged 18 or less. More than half in recent report were school-age!<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a>
Number of PCR tests reported electronically to KYDPH. Very much fewer than in earlier pandemic. (One best finds what one looking for.)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Jefferson County remains in the “Substantial” incidence rate category! How is it that the county is depicted as Green “Low Level” in the current CDC Community Levels map?<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

What are other Covid data aggregators saying?<\/strong>
I am having difficulty reconciling our home-grown Kentucky reports with those of other organizations respected for their reporting of the epidemic (or even the CDC for that matter). The New York Times (that had to sue the federal government to obtain county specific data early in the pandemic) ranks Kentucky as having the highest overall disease incidence rate of any of the 51 states and DC at 27 per 100,000 based on an average daily case number of 1196. Eleven of the top 20 counties ranked nationally by Disease Incidence Rate are in Kentucky\u2013 including the top 3. Eastern Kentucky is still a prominent national hot sport of disease activity. A large measure of the differences among reports by other agencies lies in the operational definitions and analytic processes that are intrinsic to the assembly of databases. I have touched on some of these in earlier articles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

I am willing to agree that we in Kentucky and the nation is currently in one of a series of descending\u2019s limbs of the Coronavirus epidemic. I cannot agree at present that we in Kentucky are in as rosy a position as we all want to be. I am willing to hear the arguments that we are not more-or-less on a “plateau” of epidemic activity, or that we can safely let our guard down as the fall and winter seasons progress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Peter Hasselbacher, MD
Emeritus Professor of Medicine, UofL
Kentucky Health Policy Institute
4 October 2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>