One program or two?
I had not planned on writing quite so soon about bone marrow transplantation, but in doing my background work on U.S. News & World Report’s designation of the James Graham Brown Cancer Center as a regional high-performing cancer program, I learned that the Center has just recruited a new director for their bone marrow transplant program. Dr. William Tse is an experienced clinician and academician, was recruited from West Virginia University, and will begin in Louisville in early November. This was a fast, high-priority recruitment for the University of Louisville and the Brown Cancer Center following the loss of several clinical and research faculty faculty to the University of Kentucky, and a requirement for a minimal number of specifically-trained physicians to retain essential accreditation. Bone marrow transplantation, part of the growing field of cellular or stem-cell therapy, currently plays important part in the treatment of leukemia and other malignant diseases, and of inherited genetic disorders. Cellular therapy comprises a prominent part of the University’s commercial research portfolio.
Things looking up?
I had the opportunity to speak with one of the program’s current physicians who is optimistic about the future of the program. Although I was not given the updated procedure numbers for the two programs, I am told that they are on the way back up, as are are the numbers of clinical research protocols planned. Here is a chart updated with numbers of bone marrow transplants in 2013 as reported to the state. Continue reading
Kudos to my colleagues at University Hospital.
I recently wrote about the disappointing representation of Kentucky’s hospitals in this year’s 2015 version of US News & World Reports list of Best Hospitals. Of Kentucky’s approximately 130 acute-care hospitals for adults, not a single one achieved national ranking in any of 16 different specialties. Nine Kentucky Hospitals were designated as a “Best Regional Hospital” by having one or more of 16 specialty services considered “high-performing” as defined by scoring in the top quarter of all eligible hospitals for that specialty nationally.
I went on to discuss what are in my opinion some of the difficulties and shortcomings of current attempts to rank hospitals for quality and safety. I reinforced US News’s stated intent that their program was designed to identify hospitals best suited for the most difficult cases where the services of large, high-volume teaching hospitals with abundant in-house technology might make a difference. Hospitals not on their lists may still provide high quality routine care. With a focus on cardiology and cardiac surgery, I also discussed how the mix of data elements examined can boost or diminish a given hospitals standing [and perhaps even add fuel to the current technology arms-race among hospitals].
University of Louisville Hospital makes list of Best Regional Hospitals.
I made my points and was prepared to put the matter aside when two things happened that prompted this follow-up article. The first was another full-page advertisement in our local newspaper– this time proclaiming the University of Louisville Hospital’s James Graham Brown Cancer as the “Best in Louisville for Cancer Care.” I served in that hospital for the greater part of my clinical career and was tickled and proud to see one of its former competitors joining in praise of it. I too wish to congratulate the Cancer Center of the University of Louisville. [In the spirit of full disclosure, I am a patient of the Cancer Center and have a vested interest in its quality!]
Same-sex marriage advances– hospital secrecy recedes.
While I am sure it is coincidental, I find it ironic that on the same weekend the Supreme Court refused to take on the same-sex marriage issue in Washington– thus making such marriages legal in 11 additional states– the Kentucky Court of Appeals ruled that University Medical Center Inc. is indeed a public agency. I wondered what was happening to that lingering litigation. I will try to assemble and post the various briefs from the trial and appeals courts and try fill in the gaps. The opinion gives a useful overview of hospital history. Read it here.
The stories are linked.
From my perspective, the two stories are linked because of the intrusion of religious dogma into the administrative, research, and clinical operations at University of Louisville Hospital, and indeed at UfoL itself. One of the first things KentuckyOne Health did when they took over management of University Hospital was to take away longstanding benefits to employees in legal same-sex marriages and committed domestic partnerships— a rather cruel way to save a few dollars I thought. KentuckyOne and the University claim that the hospital itself is now a private institution, can follow their own rules, and is immune to the accountability demanded by Kentucky’s Open Records Act. Jefferson County Circuit Court, Kentucky’s Attorney General, and the Appeals Court all took a rather different view, albeit for different reasons, and returned our hospital to its public. KentuckyOne and its partners now have to decide whether to appeal the decision to the Kentucky Supreme Court. I suspect they will. Avoiding exposure of what lies behind the curtain has become reflex in University matters. Continue reading
As a teacher I give a grade of D- with a C+ for effort.
Yesterday I began to dig into the first public report by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services of their Open Payments program, also known as the Sunshine Act. Under this part of the Accountable Care Act (ACA), some (but not all) payments and transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals by pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, and group purchasing organizations must be reported. There is little doubt that such payments powerfully influence the practice of medicine for better, but mostly for worse. Initial reporting in the media finds individual physicians and organizations scrambling to justify or to correct the often very startling amounts received.
I still believe the program is a great idea. The public has no idea of the extent to which industry has captured the health policy market, including the professional activities of physicians and other practitioners. Much will be learned by focusing on the outliers on both ends of the curve are already emerging from the mass of data. Indeed, I hope to be able to contribute myself. Nonetheless, in fairness to all involved, it must be recognized that this was a deeply flawed implementation. Continue reading
Data for Kentucky extracted and available for use below.
Quick overview provided.
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the data yesterday for the first iteration of its long-awaited, much-debated, and rollout-impaired Open Payments to Physicians Program, commonly referred to as the Sunshine Act. Federal law now requires that pharmaceutical and medical device companies disclose a variety of cash payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The rationale is the justifiable concern that such payments influence the practice of medicine in an undesirable manner. The Open Payment Programs and other releases of previously hidden information are in response to the demands of the public for more transparency and accountability in healthcare finance and delivery. I think is it a good idea, but we are going to have to learn as we go how to understand and use the information.
Some preliminary observations from “Identified” General Payment File only:
• 4069 Kentucky physicians received a total of $6.6 million in payments for non-research purposes.
• One physician received $230,609.
• An additional 6 physicians received more than $100,000.
• 131 physicians received more than $10,000.
• 50 physicians received more than 100 individual payments each.
• On the other end of the scale, 1810 physicians received less than $100.
Here is a simple scattergram of total payment amounts to each individual KY physician. The curve is heavily skewed to the left. A few are major recipients, most are at the free lunch level. Not included here or in the bullets above are the the many payments from the “de-identified” file for which the names of the physician or hospital are not yet resolved. (See below) Continue reading
U.S. News & World Report (USNWP) recently released its newest iteration of “Best Hospitals 2014-15.” It did not take long for hospitals around the country to begin to use that newsmagazine’s endorsement in their marketing materials, including offering licensing and advertising fees to USNWP for the privilege. Readers of this health policy series of are aware of my unaltered position on the importance of transparency and accountability in our national system of medical care. However, you should also be aware of my increasing skepticism that existing attempts to distill complex clinical or medical financial information into simple icons or letter grades to represent safe or quality medical care are not yet ready for prime time. Indeed, by themselves, such “ratings” can be unhelpful or even misleading in assisting an individual to select a hospital for a specific need. In Kentucky we have seen previously highly-rated services shut down when the facts on the ground were revealed. Continue reading
I made another pilgrimage yesterday to Jefferson Circuit Court to review all the available public documents in this internecine dispute. In particular, I had not seen the various affiliation and other agreements between the two parties. It seems to me the case will hinge on how these agreements are interpreted.
This time I got lucky and was able to photograph everything in the official court jacket including Norton’s motion to dismiss Kosair Charities’ complaint, and Kosair Charities’ response. Accompanying as attachments to these motions were a number of major agreements made over the last 30 years between the two organizations. Links to all the items are presented below. Frankly, I have not yet had time to analyze all the documents, but it appears that most of the major arguments on either side are now out in the open. I will try to get my head around them. I confess I do so with a sense of sadness. Any help in interpretation would be appreciated. Let me know if I got any of the links wrong.
The Attorney General’s Office filed to intervene. My interpretation of the documents is that the request to join the case as a plaintiff was approved.
I had a specific interest in why Plaintiff Kosair Charities requested that Judge Perry recuse himself. I anticipated that the grounds for such a request would be made available to the public, but the recusal and transfer of the case to Division 13 and Judge Fred Cowan was made without additional comment. I suspect that the pace of the case will slow a bit as it wends its way to its new home.
Emeritus Professor of Medicine, UofL
Sept 5, 2014
Court Documents in Kosair Charities Committee v. Norton Healthcare,
Jefferson Circuit Court 14 CI 02523 Continue reading
For the 30 years in which I have been associated with the University of Louisville, it’s bone marrow transplantation program has been a feather in its cap and that of the James G. Brown Cancer Center. The University of Louisville Hospital holds the Certificate of Need (CON) for adult bone marrow transplantation in Louisville – one of the tiny handful of programs that other local hospitals could not take away or did not want. Therefore I was concerned when I began to hear of doctors-lounge gossip that the program was going through a difficult patch. Unfortunately, a review of publicly available information validates my concern. Continue reading
I once helped teach medical statistics. Much dark humor and many aphorisms were to be heard. For example: “If you torture the data long enough, it will tell you what you want to hear.” Another, “Garbage in — Garbage out,” is a shorthand way of stressing the importance of data integrity and reliability. If the data is not well defined, collected, accessible, or verifiable then any subsequent conclusions are correspondingly suspect. In the age of “big-data” and transparency of medical information, this latter concept of data reliability should be guarding the door of accountability. I suggest that the standards being applied so far by CMS to data collection would not be acceptable to editors of scientific journals and yet publication is going forward. Here is what CMS is saying about its Open Payment System:
Another Accountable Care Act initiative with website problems!
For many years now, many public policy concerns have been expressed about the huge amounts of money that pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers give directly to physicians and academic medical centers. An old drug detail-man in Kentucky once told me his company gave Cadillacs to the highest prescribers of his drugs. I doubt that things are that blatant anymore, but so much money flows into individual and departmental pockets that it is difficult to assemble members for expert panels of the FDA, CDC, or other policymaking organizations who are not receiving money from drug and device makers. Full disclosure was supposed to solve the problem, but that does not work. The Open Payments initiative is part of a larger movement for greater transparency and accountability. I plan to write more about this, including my own experience over the years interacting with Pig Pharma and Big Devices.
Last week, Congress finally sent to the President the “Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014.” While the “accountability” in this title refers to making heads roll among the administration of the Veterans Administration, there was clearly some embarrassment and a deficit of legislative accountability that forced a dragging-and-kicking pair of adversarial political parties to agree to bail out a Veterans Administration that had been negligently and predictably starved into delinquency.
Vets couldn’t get timely appointments.
The substance of the bill deals almost entirely with the problem that veterans were facing unacceptably long delays in obtaining appointments for medical services. Not unexpectedly, a few items from the larger mouldering VA appropriation bills were tacked on. Since these were presumably items that were easy to agree on, I predict that passing the rest of the necessary VA legislation will become even more difficult, if it passes at all. Continue reading
[Updated in Comments Aug 23, 2014]
Next week, Kentucky’s Attorney General will plead in Jefferson and Franklin County Circuit Courts to be added as an intervening defendant in the disputes between Norton Healthcare and the University of Louisville over control of Norton Kosair Children’s Hospital, and that between Kosair Charities and Norton over the use of charitable contributions and the right to raise money in the name of the hospital. The outcomes will ultimately determine the relationships (or lack thereof) between Norton, Kosair, and the University. Relations have not been going well in recent years with UofL seeking to switch its pediatric activities from Norton to KentuckyOne Health, and Kosair charities moving to substitute UofL for Norton as a chief beneficiary of its charity. Continue reading